Monday, February 25, 2019

Coming to a nightmare near you!

Richard III

(Encylopedia Britannica)

Richard was the last of the Plantagenet kings, defeated decisively at the Battle of Boswell Fields by Henry Tudor in 1485, ushering in the Tudor era. Elizabeth I of course was Henry VII's granddaughter. As Shakespeare's continued success as a play maker — the contemporary phrase —  it was perfectly reasonable to paint the vanquished king as more dreadful than he really was. Reasonable but also politically expedient to keep the queen happy. 
Both Shakespeare and Thomas More portrayed Richard as a dreadful man, conniving, cruel and physically malformed but history has softened its judgement. 
He was born with scoliosis which twisted his spine but was neither hideous nor a hunchback though he was small of stature.
He took shocking care of his minor nephews, the older of whom had a stronger claim to the throne than Richard. Their deaths were announced but never clarified though none of this matters to Shakespeare’s play.
Richard is a villain from the start. Toward the end of the play as he loses confidents and enemies through his own behaviour. his increasingly frightening justifications for his actions  and cruelty are delivered straight at the audience who become unwilling witnesses to an unravelling soul who explains his seduction of the widow of a good man whose death Richard has arranged to an audience both mesmerized and horrified.
Was ever in this humour woo’d? 
I’ll have her but I will not keep her long.
What, I that kill'ed her husband and his father,
To take her in her heart’s extremest hate,
With curses in her mouth, tears in her eyes,
The bleeding witness of her hatred by,
Having God her conscience, and these bars against me —
And I, no friends to back my suit at all,
But the plain devil and dissembling looks —
And yet to win her, all the world to nothing!
Ha!
Hath she forgot already that brave prince,
Edward, her lord, whom I some months since,
Stabb’ed in my angry mood at Tewksbury?
A sweeter and a lovelier gentleman,
Fram’ed in the prodigality of Nature,
Young, valiant, wise and no doubt, right royal,
The specious world cannot again  afford.
And will she yet debase her on me,
That cropp'd the golden prime of that sweet prince.
And made her widow to a woeful bed
On me whose allot equal Edward’s moiety?
That halts and am misshapen thus?
[I.ii.232 — 55]e4



Saturday, February 23, 2019

King John was not a good man




History, Shakespeare and even Walt Disney's animators agree: the reign of King John (1199 — 1216), the younger brother of the wildly popular Richard the Lionhearted was a dismal time. He may have been a decent administrator — reviews are mixed — but was also known for his bad temper, irrational rages cruelty and many losses including all of Englands French lands and much of the power of the English monarchy. In June, 1215, John was forced to sign the historic Magna Carta or Great Charter which curtailed royal power in matters of taxation, justice, religion and foreign policy.
Thenews was not lost on cartoonists more than 700 years later. The 1978 Walt Disney movie, Robin Hood portrayed John as a weak snivelling imposter king imposing punitive taxes on his subjects which his brother, the rightful king was off on Crusdades (all true) 


(King John and Sir Hiss, Walt Disney Corp. 1978)

The Life and Death of King John (1590? — 1594) as Shakespeare's play is formally known ir rarely staged these days but contains one of the most vivid characters in all of Shakespeare, Falconbridge, the Bastard, the natural though illegitimate son of Richard the Lionhearted whom John has betrayed. The Bastard earns the begrudging respect of all the characters in the play with his loyalty and courage and serves his unworthy uncle to the end.
King John ends with one of the great Shakespearian rallying cries, spoken not by the miserable dying king but by his fictional nephew, Falconbridge,
          O, let us pay the time but needful woe,
          Since it hath been beforehand with our griefs.
          This England never did, nor never shall
          Lie at the proud foot of a conqueror,
          But when it did first wound itself.
          Now, these her princes are come home again
          Come the three corners of the world in arms
          And we shall shock them! Nought shall makes us rue
          If England to itself be true!
                                        [V vii. 110 — 18]


Tuesday, February 19, 2019

He's everywhere....

He's everywhere....

If your father was an English professor (as mine was) it makes sense that Shakespeare and his many plays were just part of the furniture.In the floor-to-ceiling bookshelves that lined my father's study just off the dining room, were separate books of all the plays in addition to the well worn Complete Works of Shakespeare with its tattered paper jacket that travelled with us to the cottage every summer. While the rest of us were carrying in stacks of beach towels and groceries, my father would be busy taking down the framed print of small sailboats that my uncles had hung above the fireplace, putting that in the corner and standing up the Complete Works where the print had hung. It never stayed there long. We would find him re-reading the text of whatever plays were being performed at the nearby Stratford Festival that year, plays he had read and taught for many years but nevertheless wanted to read again before loading us all into the station wagon for the long drive to the theatre. Shakespeare was a much a part of the cottage as corn on the cob and playing in the dunes.
In the decades since, I have thought little about Shakespeare or his plays.
This winter I decided to Get Back to the Bard — as they say — only to discover he is everywhere: in documentary and regular films, art museums, all over literature and journalism, psychology and ordinary conversation. Those are some of the places I have found traces of William Shakespeare. I suspect his influence may be encountered in science, medicine, and professional politics, areas I know little about.
What I know so far is that the more Shakespeare I read, the greater his reach seems to stretch.